Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Govedar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:52Z

[edit] Danny Govedar

Danny Govedar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable person; no news sources found about him. Also nominating:

Smog Town Boys (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
EHW (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
DX Films (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Veinor (talk to me) 02:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep I don't know if thiss is where to put it, buy i don't think that the article Danny Govedar, DX Films, EHW, and SMog Town Boys should be deleted. Danny, owner/founder has asked for my help to put his film company up. He has already filmed several bands, ect, and i feel that if you are to remove DX Films, why don't you remove Paramount, or steven speilburg, they're just a movie company and a movie director. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hyscule (talk • contribs) 02:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
    • Comment The previous !vote was copied verbatim from my talk page here. Veinor (talk to me) 02:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Paramount and Steven Spielberg are different because they satisfy the notability guidelines; we have multiple independent sources that have devoted entire articles to them (and probably entire books, as well). I can't possibly see how we'd find any for DX Films or Danny Govedar. Veinor (talk to me) 02:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all No reliable, independent sources found. -SpuriousQ (talk) 02:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all Elementary school kid who supposedly makes films but doesn't have an IMDB entry, my bare-minimum criterion for filmmakers. Comparison to Steven Spielberg is simply absurd. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per Starblind. Luis1972 (Talk • My Contribs) 06:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all and salt for all reasons already mentioned and the high likelihood of re-creation. A1octopus 10:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I don't think protects are done preemptively. Veinor (talk to me) 15:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete all Clearly non-notable. dcandeto 16:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all No reliable, independent, sources on any of them. SkierRMH 19:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all unless reliable sources can be found to demonstrate this is not a non notable enterprise. Nuttah68 15:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per Starblind, lacks sources to establish notability.-- danntm T C 23:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - nothing notable here. It was painful just seeing how little there really was. --Bejnar 04:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.