Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Lloyd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 19:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Danielle Lloyd

WP:BIO, minor celebrity. Non-notable. Sunfazer | Talk 15:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. If the subject really is a former Miss England and the current Miss Great Britain, she is surely sufficiently notable. Bucketsofg✐
  • Comment - only sufficiently notable, not in the same way as Heidi Klum or Kate Moss. --Sunfazer | Talk 15:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
    • So if you agree it's sufficiently notable, what's the reason for deletion? Aplomado talk 16:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
    • The person themselves isn't really notable. --Sunfazer | Talk 16:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, Google pulls in 12,000 hits, many of which appears to be unique. Appears to be a widely-circulated model on the internet, besides being married to a notable footballer and a British national pageant winner. Aplomado talk 16:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per all above. A winner of a National Pageant is surely notable? Jcuk 19:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - does it meet WP:BIO. In a few months she may not be a celebrity. --Sunfazer | Talk 20:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Danielle Lloyd is Teddy Sheringham's girlfriend, is in the press quite a bit in the UK and is generally notable. --Toph3r 22:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - WP:BIO states Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events. Check [1] and [2] (toward the bottom). On that basis, Danielle Lloyd qualifies. Robwingfield (talk) 09:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - verifiable. The JPS talk to me 12:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - as per above. Another reason why notability is subjective, POV, and should not be used as a criteria for inclusion in or deletion from Wikipedia. DanielZimmerman 19:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I have blanked my own article because I don't want an entry on Wikipedia. --Danielle Lloyd 11:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. People don't get to choose whether or not they have an article on them. Agree with Jcuk. Stifle (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. --Phroziac ♥♥♥♥ 16:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.