Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniell cell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator. - Mailer Diablo 21:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daniell cell

Wikipedia has an article Daniel cell on exactly the same topic. Google search shows 1,010 entries for Daniel cell and 815 hit for Daniell cell DV8 2XL 01:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Redundant. DV8 2XL 01:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• When someone has not only made a mis-spelling but has been so convinced of that mis-spelling that they go to the length of making a real article on the subject, we Merge and Redirect the article with the mis-spelled title, because if it happens once, it will no doubt happen again. Better that people who spell incorrectly go to the correct article than that we continually have to bring such articles to AFD.

  Ironically, for both Google and the nominator, it is this article that has the correctly spelled title, John Frederic Daniell having two 'l's in his family name. Counting Google hits is not research. Keep. Uncle G 18:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. It wasn't over the spelling, just the duplication, and the fact that the single 'l' article is more complete. Regardless which one is kept, only one is needed. DV8 2XL 19:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • This is why Wikipedia:Duplicate articles exists. Deletion does not form a part of the process at any stage. Uncle G 20:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Thanks, Uncle G I was not aware of that process. Can arrangements be made to transfer this over there? DV8 2XL 21:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Closing mod. This AfD was raised in error. Please close ASAP, as keep and I will processes it via the proper route. DV8 2XL 09:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.