Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wultz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE (T+C) at 04:33 UTC (2006-05-25)

[edit] Daniel Wultz

Unencyclopedic and very unnecessary —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ampersand777 (talk • contribs)

I attended school with Daniel, and, while his death was tragic, this article is unencyclopedic. It may be a good idea to create an April 17 suicide bombing article, but an entire article on Daniel is unnecessary.Amp 02:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, just as we don't have articles on each 9/11 victim, we shouldn't have one for someone whose only claim to notability is that he was an American caught in the Israel-Palestinian line of fire at the wrong time. Kimchi.sg 02:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non notable. Just as Kimchi said above, we don't have an article for every 9-11 victim. Touching, though. Funnybunny (talk/Counter Vandalism Unit) 03:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn-bio. --Terence Ong 04:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Joe 04:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all above. Rockpocket (talk) 08:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I concur with the above. --Kristjan Wager 11:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as the only thing encyclopedic about him is the way he died. It might be worthwhile if someone explained to the user who created the article the reason why it is being deleted. Andjam 11:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: While we may not be able to feature this article, we offer our condolences to family and friends for Daniel's tragic death this week. Tyrenius 13:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm with Amp. Although it's very sad that he died, wikipedia is not an obit column. An article about the bombing would be better. --Alphachimp talk 19:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, sad, but not encyclopædic. Lankiveil 23:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all above. VegaDark 00:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment His murderer has a page - why can't he? User:XMan 14:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.138.243 (talk • contribs) ("signed" using a non-existent user's signature with incorrect timestamp)
  • Don't delete - Daniel was part of a speech prsented by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to the entire Congress. He spoke of the number of children who continue to be vicitims of terrorism. Daniel was mentioned at length and Congress was very moved by this. (ayahc) Ayahc
Have you got references for this such as newspaper reports? Sign your comments with 4 tildes ~ Tyrenius 17:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.