The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Googled, didn't appear to be that well-known! suspect vanity Stephenb(Talk) 10:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete unless the claims to notability (criticism by environmental organizations etc.) are verified. Otherwise hoax/vanity. Lukas 11:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per WP:BIO. PJM 12:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.