Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Mayne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. kingboyk 09:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Mayne
minor English politician. His claim to fame seems to be that he's chairman of a local division of his party. The only thing offered up for verification is that he's listed here as a supporter of a national politician, along with tons of other people. I don't see that he comes close to meeting WP:BIO standards for inclusion. Friday (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - being the chair of a constituency association is not notable. Humansdorpie 22:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
I m Daniel Mayne, this page is completely untrue, the “claim to fame,” is rubbish. This is someone’s idea of a particle joke, I do have a keen interest in politics but it seems someone has taken it too far, I would be grateful if the page could be deleted as soon as possible (—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.141.164 (talk • contribs) )
Deathphoenix ʕ 00:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. Royboycrashfan 00:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete ,nn. Fetofs Hello! 01:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable, doesn't meet WP:BIO. Speedy? Jude(talk,contribs) 01:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. mikka (t) 01:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as everyone has said, nn. Staxringold 02:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, not close to WP:BIO Deizio 02:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete- In my opinion fails Wp:BIO Reyk 03:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete agreed, per nom, nn -- Samir ∙ T C 08:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.