The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 00:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I nominated this article for deletion, as there is nothing in it to suggest that Daniel Kingsley (while he sounds like an excellent human being) is remarkable enough to merit an article of his own (yet). At best, it seems to fall foul of OR. Nomist 21:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete per WP:BIO. Looks like an autobiography. MartinDK 22:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.