Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Cormack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. While 4-0 (including the nominator) is smaller quorum that I would like to see, the arguments seem straightforward and convincing, and there was no refutation. I do not see a need to relist. Herostratus 17:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Cormack

Not notable; likely vanity/auto-biography. Wikipedia is not the London Film Production directory. See also Actaeon Films's AfD. Girolamo Savonarola 10:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable per search engine tests. A lot of the results are for irrelevant sites. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 10:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per WP:BIO and WP:VAIN, few relevant google results [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 10:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. TheRealFennShysa 17:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.