Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous Foods

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. ABCD 18:55, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dangerous Foods

POV, original research. There might be a decent article on how different foods can cause problems, but this isn't it. RickK 00:43, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for the same reasons as Rick. Academic Challenger 00:48, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Title is inherently POV, article is original research. This topic is more properly discussed at nutrition, among other places. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 00:56, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - agree with TenOfAllTrades. Also already covered elsewhere. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:12, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV, original research. Binadot 02:29, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, inherrently POV, orig research. DaveTheRed 05:55, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV material which is already covered elsewhere. Mgm|^(talk) 10:54, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Commander Keen 3.5 :). Also, delete current content. Radiant_* 12:36, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Saopaulo1 07:09, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn foodcruft. ComCat 05:35, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Phobophile 03:38, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV; it would be more appropriate to have a balanced article on the different viewpoints various experts have over which foods are good or bad for you, with citations, but this isn't it. -- Dan -- 16:09, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.