Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, doesn't assert notability per WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dangerous!

Dangerous! (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Appears non-notable and failing WP:MUSIC. Only myspace and one mp3 website cited is a big give away. Supporting LA Guns I don't think makes them particularly notable, zero ghits, no albums or songs listed. "Downloads in the thousands" is uncited. SGGH ^speak! 16:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete This is simple. No sources. -- Carerra^"Chatter" 16:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Doesn't meet requirements for WP:BAND. The sources are self-referential and fail WP:RS. Downloads in the thousands, with no statistics (which, can be challenged anyways). Yngvarr (c) 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Yes, simple. Professor marginalia (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 18:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy no sources, no article Sethie (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no reliable sources given for claims. All I get for "thousands of downloads" is last.fm, which simply claims 16,375 people have listened to them, hardly enough to base a claim on (no downloads on last.fm either). No news coverage, fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}Strange Frequencies 19:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.