Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dane Kusić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was that delete seems to be the consensus. Daniel 03:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dane Kusić

Dane Kusić (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nn professor; fails WP:PROF Carlossuarez46 17:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep due to multiple publications listed on her CV. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - any third party sources? If not, delete. Davnel03 18:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 20:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:PROF. Eusebeus 20:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete CV claims to have been a "Professor of music", but exact rank not stated and not verifiable. PhD not until 1996, so not likely to have risen to full professor by 2001, after which moved into Java programming. Almost no significant peer-reviewed papers, no books. the CV includes teaching positions "cancelled because of lack of enrollment". GRC, which are the publications that impressed you?DGG (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I've read the CV, Resume and website, and see no evidence of notability, no evidence of having a notable impact on academic research or thinking in the area of ethnomusicology. Pete.Hurd 23:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above--Crusio 10:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. RainbowOfLight Talk 11:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Although it appears that subject has removed all content anyway. --Sc straker 02:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.