Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing Banana
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Woohookitty 04:23, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dancing Banana
This page was tagged for speedy deletion for being "useless nonsense", but I decided to move it here to VFD because I am not sure if the subject itself is notable enough to merit its own article, if it should get expanded, or redirect to emoticon. Thus, I abstain. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 3 July 2005 15:19 (UTC)
- OK, redirect to emoticon. — Chameleon 3 July 2005 15:57 (UTC)
- Delete - trivial. CDC (talk) 3 July 2005 16:01 (UTC)
- Delete- no redir. I've seen it before, but it's by no means popular. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 16:29 (UTC)
- Redirect to emoticon. I do think the emoticon is relatively popular, but I don't know what the heck one could say about it besides that it's a dancing banana, and/or post links (but Wikipedia is not a web directory.) Dcarrano July 3, 2005 17:36 (UTC)
Weak delete hmm... interesting one this. It's certainly popular, but I can't think there's ever going to be much to write about this in an encyclopedia. Perhaps merge and redirect, mentioning this in emoticon....
Redirect to User:Andrew LinDelete. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 01:01 (UTC)- Keep- The Dancing Banana is more popular than many of the Internet Memes who have their own Wikipedia page. For example Moshzilla has 837 Google hits which pales in comparison to the Dancing Banana which comes in at 16,100! uberzev 5 July 2005 08:20 (UTC)
- Redirect. There is not a good reason to make the name dancing banana not to go to emoticon. And answering Uberzev, the fact this Meme is popular does not change the fact that there is nothing to be said about it. Oh, ok I recorded the article, btu it was I have to agree it's not very usefull --Alexandre Van de Sande 7 July 2005 02:46 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.