Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance Dance Evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Since this has already been sent to BJAODN, it can be deleted, meeting CSD. bibliomaniac15 ^{BUY NOW!} 03:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dance Dance Evolution

Dance Dance Evolution (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Caution: lame joke article

This is a joke article. The game doesn't exist. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Yes it does —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.196.196 (talk • contribs) — 142.167.196.196 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• No it doesn't. Nya nya. :-) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Wow, ridiculously lame, utterly obvious hoax. Delete, do not pass go, do not collect $100 and do not transwiki to BJAODN or Uncyclopedia. I think this article may be primed for a speedy delete. TheLetterM 03:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• aww, no BJAODN? Non the less, Nuke it. The reception part made me laugh though. Kwsn^(Ni!) 03:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I take that back actually. I think this might be good for BJAODN (if it ever comes back again). TheLetterM 03:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I'm adding this to BJAODN. KJS77 03:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• It's only lame because you dont' understand it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.198.32 (talk) — 142.167.198.32 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Strong delete. Odd concept for an educational game, but if the game doesn't exist, the game doesn't exist. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• I think its an awesome educational concept, kids need to learn more about their ancestors, you guys should really consider keeping this game, I think it has a lot of educational value. --Jefferson Airplane 03:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • True as that may be, it's nonexistent and thus constitutes a hoax. TheLetterM 03:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, but you also created the article, JA. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• BJAODN, shamelessly lame but lamely funny (funnily lame?) HOAX. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 03:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete but an admirable, elaborate attempt K-lit 03:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Article has been BJAODNed, I have tagged it for speedy but if you feel this article should stand the five days AFD, feel free to remove the db tag. TheLetterM 03:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as hoax: interesting, but fails almost every Wikipedia standard, including reality. Nyttend 03:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• I also take back what I said about Uncyclopedia, as this article is a repost from there. Let's blow this thing and go home. TheLetterM 03:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.