Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Waniek

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 18:08, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dan Waniek

Vanity? Only 300 hits on google, most of which are relevant. [1] GRider\^talk 23:53, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, cleanup and expand. A published professor and researcher, [2]. Megan1967 04:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, self-promotion. Wyss 19:20, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete self-promotion, publications are self-published vanity. Johntex 21:32, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, do pseudoscientists count as notable? --nixie 01:08, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, looks notable. JamesBurns 10:38, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, it's been around a while, nominated for deletion 10 months ago, cleanup isn't forthcoming. dbenbenn | talk 18:08, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.