Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Tierney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, no valid assertion of notability; part of "Team Murphy" PR campaign. NawlinWiki 21:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dan Tierney

Dan Tierney (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable political activist, POV campaign page, also conflict of interest as one of the editors appears to be a member of the campaign ticket. The individual is not now an officeholder and is not running for any government office, he is just running for the presidency of a political organization. Montco 00:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

• strong delete, see my comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Murphy — BillC ^talk 01:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. See my explanation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Colon, which holds here mutatis mutandis. --N Shar 02:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOT a soapbox and/or webhost. Article also fails to meet WP:V standard and WP:BIO. -- MarcoTolo 02:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete - vanity, non-notable --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 03:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for vanity (lots) and notability (none). Philippe Beaudette 04:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Running for, or even being elected to, an office within the youth division of a political party is not enough in itself to satisfy WP:BIO. --Metropolitan90 06:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Ulysses Zagreb 09:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:BIO. •CHILLDOUBT• 11:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete , no sources therefore fails WP:V Alf photoman 14:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.