Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Rosenthal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (non-admin closing debate). Seraphim Whipp 21:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dan Rosenthal

Dan Rosenthal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete article does not establish notability. Non-notable per WP:BIO and WP:NN Strothra 05:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep Article seems to assert notability, but is unsourced. Edward321 04:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 04:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I'd imagine that anyone holding that position would at least be notable enough for a Wikipedia article, but sources are needed.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 05:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
That position doesn't make him notable - there are many many mid-level political appointees, not all of them are notable per WP:BIO. Also, he no longer has the position as Clinton is no longer in office. His lack of notability is furthered by the fact that beyond his brief time in that position, google comes up with nothing regarding his activities. --Strothra 14:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Per above comments (the person's job). Is a stub, obviously, and needs sourcing and if possible, expansion. - Rjd0060 05:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - As per comments of h i s -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 10:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete I see no reason why this particular position should be notable, unless someone can explain it. DGG (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.