Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Crippen

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 00:56, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dan Crippen

Google turns up 596 unique matches for this individual. [1] Resume-cruft, or "encyclopedic" information? GRider\^talk 20:15, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, but with reservations. Article needs expansion. Megan1967 23:39, 22 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, public servant-cruft?--nixie 00:26, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, sounds plenty notable. Kappa 02:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Member of some government groups, but then so are many people, he doesn't appear to have done anything very special with his membership. Unless notability is further established than this article and a couple hundred google matches, delete. Radiant! 09:11, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Based on the evidence available, he does not quite seem to meet my understanding of the recommended criteria for inclusion of biographies. Delete unless further evidence is presented. Rossami (talk) 00:05, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, 4 years as director of CBO seems notable enough. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:27, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The CBO is a lot more notable than it sounds, as is its director. Gamaliel 05:31, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This guy is one of the top contenders for the job of NASA Administrator (as indicated by NASAWatch). Hektor

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.