Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Buckley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure). Subject is notable, questionable deletion rationale by nominator perhaps not completely familiar with deletion policy. WilliamH (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dan Buckley
Not notable, patent nonsense Deathdestroyer (talk) 04:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Speedy keep. Obviously notable, no claims to support nonsense. AfD is made by a brand new editor with eleven edits outside of this AfD, all to the same article, summarized by a warning for edit warring. MrPrada (talk) 05:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep "patent nonsense" is a bit strong. Marvel Entertainment is a large organisation (US$485,807,000 operating income in 2007) with a huge following. Dan Buckley has a public profile and is widely quoted by a range of media, including the national and international press. Debate (talk) 05:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per User:Debate and MrPrada. Publisher for Marvel? I highly doubt this qualifies as "patent nonsense" in the least, and if it did, you should have nominated it for speedy deltion per Criterion G1. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 07:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This article is not nonsense and he is Marvel's publisher.--Berig (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep pblisher and COO of Marvel is a pretty big deal, and the nomination doesn't fit (how is this nonsense?) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
