Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dambaek entertainment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 05:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dambaek entertainment
Not sure about the notability of this one. Google gives me nothing, but brought here just in case this is a case of systemic bias. Does anyone have any information from WP:RS indicating this company meets WP:CORP? If not, delete per reasons stated and for violation of WP:V. --Kinu t/c 23:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also included: "An Cúir" (The Cause), the film created by this company. Notability concern of the production house aside, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and all that. --Kinu t/c 23:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable firm; should have been speedied to begin with. --Mhking 00:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Dambaek Entertainment is a small but existing film company in Denmark, I sincerely hope that the most benevolant administrators of Wikipedia do not just go by a search on google for results on this company. Dambaek Entertainment Inc. is just currently setting up on the internet. I was surprised to find my company on wikipedia and actually got some interest today about my current project from people looking at it, and found out that they were friends of a work collegue of mine. I would sincerely hope that the Artikle on dambaek ent. inc can stay on wikipedia. I have always cherrished this website for valuable information and am hoping that we can find an agreement. will all my respect sincerely Phillip C. Sem Dambaek-pdambaek 03:07, 23 April 2007 (GMT)
- Can you show, from reliable sources, that the company meets Wikipedia's notability standards for companies, organizations, etc.? Verifiability is a core policy on Wikipedia, and articles that do not meet that criterion are to be deleted. Yes, Google is not the final say on existence, but if a company is notable, then certainly something will be available about it online, in the news, etc. Wikipedia is a tertiary source of information. Once your company has a website and its existence can be verified, and it and its films are talked about by secondary sources (such as the media), then it belongs on Wikipedia. --Kinu t/c 02:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your imediate reply. I am really confunded by all the wikipedia paperwork to go through is there any way simpler to get this aproved? sincerely phillip C. Sem Dambæk --pdambaek 04:33, 23 April 2007 (GMT)
- Can you show, from reliable sources, that the company meets Wikipedia's notability standards for companies, organizations, etc.? Verifiability is a core policy on Wikipedia, and articles that do not meet that criterion are to be deleted. Yes, Google is not the final say on existence, but if a company is notable, then certainly something will be available about it online, in the news, etc. Wikipedia is a tertiary source of information. Once your company has a website and its existence can be verified, and it and its films are talked about by secondary sources (such as the media), then it belongs on Wikipedia. --Kinu t/c 02:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - No assertion of notability, not even from its founder Dambaek. Phony Saint 01:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete No assertion of notability whatsoever--why relist? Darkspots 02:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
