Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisuke Sakaguchi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep due to apparent bad-faith nomination. --Coredesat 04:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Daisuke Sakaguchi

4.18GB 01:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)is this really notable for a page?

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep, perfectly notable seiyu. As much as I hate to say this, this AfD reeks of a bad faith nom. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 13:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep notable voice actor with many roles in major games and series. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Dskj 13:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable voice actor. NawlinWiki 15:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep as bad faith nom. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Does appear to be notable. Pursey 20:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- RoninBKETC 22:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I dont think this is a bad faith nom, but this is definitely a notable person. Resolute 00:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy snowball keep the article does him no justice. (See the Japanese article for further details.) The seiyu industry in Japan is very large and produces nationally known stars. He's a very prolific seiyuu and, I'd say, notable. --Kunzite 01:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Any chance you, (or anybody for that matter,) could translate and add info from :ja to here? Not that it needs it to survive AfD, but it would be nice. --RoninBKETC 02:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.