Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Nexus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. IceKarmaॐ 01:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daily Nexus

I'm not entirely convinced that college newspapers are sufficiently notable and thought I'd submit this to the community for discussion. --Alan Au 01:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

  • I feel this is a worthwhile contribution, as it's a longstanding paper that's been producing daily news for the last 35 years. This is no flash-in-the-pan publication, but an institution that has eeked into national news more than once. Aside from that, the paper is the primary news service for people living in and around Isla Vista, California. It has a daily circulation of 20,000. So in that light, I feel that the Daily Nexus is entirely deserving of an entry. --Kidicarus222 04:57, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • keep. A daily circulation of 20k passes my notability threshold! — brighterorange (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've heard of it, and I didn't go to UCSB. Nohat 18:45, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. — Phil Welch 22:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. A student newspaper with a 20,000 daily circulation is notable enough for mine and the article is of a high quality. Capitalistroadster 23:44, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. See Orion (newspaper), The Stanford Daily, Daily Illini. . . Chick Bowen 04:28, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is no bigger than your average corporate newsletter, which I wouldn't dream of accepting as a separate article. Summarize and merge with UCSB. / Peter Isotalo 12:23, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. 20k readers don't deserve an article? Peter must be an exclusionist. ··gracefool |☺ 07:33, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.