Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daddy Fantastic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, AfD does not govern merges; that is up to those that want it. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Daddy Fantastic
Non-notable band, they don't even have a record deal. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Non-notable. Merge into Pete Bennett, if that article survives AfD. Han-Kwang 21:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Band will be signed in a matter of days by a major record deal
- Delete Having a major deal doens't make you notable; you have to have done something notable first. WP:MUSIC talk to JD wants e-mail 09:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As they have been offered a record deal, they have potential.
- Keep They have acclaimed credible attention on MySpace's 'unsigned bands'
- Merge into Pete Bennett, until they actually are notable enough Will (Take me down to the Paradise City) 21:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Pete Bennett for the time being, and if they become more notable, recreate.Anon Dude 10:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Pete Bennett until they become worthy of their own page
- Merge into Pete Bennett per Will 82.39.52.221 09:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Pete Bennett per Will (Pally01 09:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC))
- Keep They are almost guaranteed a record label and many people see them having a strong future in the next year. The article will be remade if deleted because of this so I personally see it as a waste of time. Jdh89manson 21:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep They pass the notability test, with extensive press coverage.
- Keep A BBC documentary series on the band is coming out soon, so a lot more will be known about them.--DrPoodle 21:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.