Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSDI
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as spam (again). Salting this time. Awyong J. M. Salleh 02:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DSDI
Delete Contested prod. Article Dsdi already speedily deleted three times. Article does not assert notability of the subject, is more a general treatise on drop shipping and reads like an advertisement. Katr67 00:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Miskwito 00:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as mostly-ad for nn-corp. The encyclopediac material is already covered in drop shipping. DMacks 01:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:ADVERT. Also non-notable. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons given above --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Question: How is it that the DOBA entry qualifies as a valid article, when DSDI's does not??? It seems that there is a great degree of subjective preference regarding inclusion into Wikipedia. Most readers will benefit from the content mentioned within DSDI, whereas the entry for doba contains no substantive value (and certainly does not qualify for notable inclusion). Please advise as to the level of fairness in this case. Thank you! --Corrinderz 01:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Here is another source: macRAE's Blue Blook Entry is also listed within Thomas Register, the most comprehensive reference for manufacturers and distributors --Corrinderz 01:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment Read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS please. JuJube 01:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Here is the reference for [http://www.thomasnet.com/profile.html?cov=NA&which=comp&what=dsdi&searchpos=1&cid=20103123&navsec=results Thomas Register' --Corrinderz 01:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick FYI to all: removed less relevant sources and provided more noteworthy ones. Hopefully, this will help with the process! THX --Corrinderz 01:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Please advise as to whether modified refs qualify article as notable...THX --Corrinderz 01:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Daniel5127 | Talk 01:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Modified some promotional reference to DSDI the organization within article. Hopefully, this will suffice. --Corrinderz 01:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
