Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DROP DEAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 21:49, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DROP DEAD

Delete, appears to be another non-notable webcomic. "DROP DEAD" + "James Russell-Field" gets 0 hits on Google.--Idont Havaname 00:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Vsion 04:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising with email to order. No relevant Google hits without the author's name either. I'd be happy to reconsider if at the very least evidence of existence is provided. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, looks like self-promotion to me Coyote-37 13:41, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't even seem to be verifiable, as the link is dead. I'm not sure there are many arguments in favour of having an article on a "web"-comic that's not even available over the web! — Haeleth Talk 20:41, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - spam, vanity, nn, etc. StarryEyes 23:31, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:27, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for obvious reasons. Tedzsee 04:46, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and everybody else. Dragonfiend 06:38, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.