Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ insomnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Royboycrashfan 04:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DJ insomnia

Vanity page (WP:VAIN), non notable (WP:BIO). It was listed for a speedy delete but contested Equendil Talk 02:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. MSJapan 02:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kalani ^[talk] 02:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 03:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Article also fails to assert notability Ydam 08:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ydam Kevin 10:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy per nominator's original intent and reasoning. Colonel Tom 11:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, nn. --Terence Ong 14:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy perhaps. Xyrael ^T 19:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per Xyrael --Guinnog 19:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Though highly probable, there's no indication that the author of the article is also the subject, so userfying seems inappropriate. That would be an improvement on the current "Welcome bitches" message on the author's page however (User:Theeedragonseye}}. Equendil Talk 11:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Please speedy delete this vanity, I see no assertion of notability. Grandmasterka 03:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.