Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DINO Attack

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. Joyous (talk) 19:19, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DINO Attack

Individual LEGO sets are non notable. humblefool® 02:38, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

• This is about a line of sets, not a single set. Weak keep if expanded. — JIP | Talk 05:07, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• It seems notable. And we still have quite a bit of not paper left, so keep for now. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 06:11, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Needs work, but definite keep. Agentsoo 10:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - verifiable and it is about a whole range. Needs expansion though -- Lochaber 11:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and improve. Ashmodai 12:58, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Do notability established. SYSS Mouse 20:38, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Legocruft. I doubt any expansion is possible. --Carnildo 23:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I had to restore the vfd tag on this. What is a "fictional toyline"? Do these things exist as genuine, real-world, plastic lego or do they only exist on the website? If the former, keep, if the latter, delete. Flowerparty ^talk 00:06, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • I found [1], which would appear to suggest they exist but are not widely available. I'm in the UK, where Lego remains 'popular', and I'm unable to buy it according to the site. I think the article is just confused about a lego set having a fictional story line to it, and being actually fictional. -Splash 00:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm inclined to think we only need articles on the 'notable' Lego lines e.g. Lego Technic, not all of them. Do not merge to Lego since that does not currently detail the minutiae of each line that has been produced. -Splash 00:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Some individual Lego sets are notable (mmm, Super Car). Lego lines are also non-cruffty. Almafeta 13:25, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I just restored the vfd tag a second time; it was absent for two days. Flowerparty ^talk 21:27, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Sasquatch. I had to restore the vfd tag a third time, btw. Punkmorten 09:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep on the theory that information has value. Ankles 08:55, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.