Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DEViANCE (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DEViANCE

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/DEViANCE Articles for deletion/DEViANCE (2nd nomination)
DEViANCE (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable cracking group, fails WP:BIO criteria. The rationale from the previous nomination 3 years ago still holds - Google brings up only Wikipedia mirrors for <DEViANCE CyberNaj> [1], and the article remains unsourced although people were asking for sources even back then. Resurgent insurgent 06:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. Fairly well-known amongst crackers, but finding (reliable) sources may be difficult, considering the nature of the group. - Myanw 10:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, Fails WP:NN and WP:VERIFY. --Javit 12:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 20:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - distinct lack of WP:INDY WP:RS. 81.104.175.145 04:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - in addition to reasons above, unencyclopedic tone and lack of any substantial information beyond a handful of sentences. --EEMeltonIV 12:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - if you repeat the Google search with the modified query deviance cybernaj -wikipedia you get precisely two hits, both of which are non-compliant mirrors. 81.104.175.145 12:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • keep - this group is fairly well known, but I guess finding reliable info would be a problem.
    If "finding reliable info would be a problem" then you actually mean "delete". 81.104.175.145 09:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.