Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DCKC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Clearly, there is a valid article to be written at this title; that valid article has little to do with the draft now present, though. Xoloz 17:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DCKC

This term is completely new. The entire article is original research. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

While it may be a marketing term - or at least the initials for one - it is not one applied in the way that the article is claiming it is: As the name of a shared continuity among animated series never said to have a shared continuity. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 17:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Really? What makes you think that it is new? Uncle G 09:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
    • What makes it new is that it has never been used to represent an supposed continuity before. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 17:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - article isn't perfect but that doesn't mean it has to go. At worst, I could see deleting this and making a category for it. My Alt Account 09:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep not a neologism. What's the grounds for deletion here? ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 10:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete A review of the links provided by Uncle G shows that the phrase "DC Comics Kids Collection" (it is never referred to by the initials DCKC) is nothing more than an imprint on the top of certain DVD collections. There is no assertion in any of the links that it refers to a single continuity, or is indeed anything more than a marketing phrase. CovenantD 16:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Neologism, original research. --InShaneee 17:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is a marketing term for DVD releases, not a recognized continuity. TheMagnificentHazo 02:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Many google hits for many "DCKC's" not related to the comics. :) Dlohcierekim 23:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This marketing term may merit an article, but this article will never provide useful material for that questionably-useful article, as it describes a continuity that doesn't actually exist. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 22:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.