Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'ni numerals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. No sourced material, nothing to merge. -- RG² 02:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] D'ni numerals

D'ni numerals (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

in-universe article that has no references. Ridernyc 15:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

• Merge with D'ni language. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 16:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the lot of D'ni * and merge any useful to Myst or possibly D'ni (itself highly questionable). JJL 17:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into D'Ni, with the codicil of sourcing & providing references.SkierRMH 00:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge brief description and possibly illustration into D'ni. SFT | Talk 01:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with D'ni language, obviously. I guess there's nothing wrong with short grammatical descriptions of languages, but those shouldn't be spread out over multiple pages. —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 06:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge; I would choose D'ni for the target, but if D'ni language remains, I see no problem with merging it there. It should be noted that all these related articles are up for deletion; see the list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'ni. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 14:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete as this fictional counting system has no reliable sources to demonstrate notability per se. --Gavin Collins 14:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.