Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyd Black

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 06:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cyd Black

Cyd Black (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Probably non-notable, reads like an advert. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 21:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Despite blantant WP:COI, Cyd Black might be legitimately notable. I have found some mention of him as an innovator, but not enough WP:RS for a NPOV rewrite. A related discussion at the AfD for Sarah Jane Ceylon is ongoing with 3rd party sources promised. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. While I regard notability as legitimate, the blatant WP:COI self reference was a mistake in hindsight and would continually be a point of contention. Will not contest or comment further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cydblack (talk • contribs) 03:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - COI, Promo, NN and Advert. Spawn Man ^{Review Me!} 11:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.   jj137 ♠ Talk 23:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.