Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber (subculture)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --JForget 00:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cyber (subculture)

Cyber (subculture) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't think this is likely to be verifiable. P4k (talk) 13:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete-No verifiability; the sources seem to be blog-like and there seems to be a lack of citations in the article. --Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep assuming decent sources can be found- I'm well aware of the cyber subculture and I'm fairly sure they can be found, only I can't look right now. This article also needs to be watched as it seems to have suffered from frequent vandalism. MorganaFiolett (talk) 14:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. Notable, and sources can almost certainly be found. --S.dedalus 06:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    • If you can find them feel free to list them here.P4k 06:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    • To be less glib about it: just asserting that sources can be found without backing that up isn't much of an argument.P4k 06:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, from this Google News search I would assume this is subject is sourcable, though parts of the article should probably be removed. - Zeibura (Talk) 03:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
    Added a few references. Searching for "cyber" alone is a bit of a killer, but nevertheless, I'm sure this is a topic worthy of inclusion. - Zeibura (Talk) 03:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep now that sources have been added, hopefully there will be more to come. RFerreira (talk) 00:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.