Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cute gurlzz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cute gurlzz

WP:WEB - no Alexa data, advert, SPAM, shameless promotion Rklawton 16:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. NawlinWiki 16:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not free ad space. --DarkAudit 23:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. The site says "if your a cute girl, what could be funner than having a picture drawn of you?" Funner? --DaveG12345 00:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Er, Cute Gurlzz is a free resource that makes no money and promotes no business. Its not spam, its not shameless promotion and its a fair reference to the term Cute Gurlzz which is unique. The site makes available free images for people to use as avatars and icons or in anyway they wish. The use of the word Funner is a fun derivation of the word fun, to have fun, having fun.

But hey, delete it if you want. I guess maybe your like that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.206.145 (talk • contribs)

  • (The above is the user's only contribution to WP to date.)
  • Comment Don't blame me, I didn't write WP:WEB. --DaveG12345 03:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:WEB and WP:SPAM. Possible A8 candidate. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Its not my only contribution i'm mentioned elsewhere but you also seem to have deleted my other stuff as well even though people in exact same position are alloed to keep their stuff on Wikipedia.

All I can say is that maybe I could rewrite the entry more in the third party. Geez, you people are so low. Its a unique web site that has been running for over two years, Cute Gurlzz are unique, they are like Play Boy Bunnys, its like having a reference for My Space. My Space is a networking site etc. Cute Gurlzz is an established site for girls to get a free drawing. There are no Google Ads, no Adverts, no links, no requests for money, and moreover, Wikipedia is not going to generate any traffic for the site. I just thought as I had a bit of time i'd do a Wikepedia. All I can say is that maybe I could do with making the listing more objective.

I run a web directory myself thats free and I never behave like this with people, you know, if theres something lacking you should correct it, not judge, especially when you havn't looked at the site, I can see that only one of the top four 'judgees' actually looked at the site. And since then 1-2 more people have had a quick glance. Its only 1 page with a database of images.

  • Do you also vandalize user pages in this directory of yours? Rklawton 23:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
What do you do with folks who use your sites and who refuse to follow the rules? At Wikipedia, we discuss the matter and (sometimes) delete their articles. If you've got a better way, don't hesitate to let us know. Rklawton 16:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Notability Author claims to have had his site up since 2004. The site asks visitors to send in photos, and the website posts drawings made from the photos. During this time, the website has generated 57 drawings. Wheee!!! I think we can safely speedy delete this website without worrying too much more about notability. Rklawton 17:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) (by User:Rawktonspal)

    • Comment: This user has been indefinitely blocked. Stifle (talk) 09:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --mtz206 (talk) 00:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 00:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 03:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:VSCA. Only a small handful of submissions and frankly, looks rather scary. Stifle (talk) 09:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.