Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cut it out

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 19:49, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cut it out

wiki is not a dictionary

• Delete this seems to be a well-intentioned first attempt at a page, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary or phrase book.Bwithh 19:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef, but as Bwithh pointed out this does appear to be a good faith attempt at creating an article. Hopefully the author isn't discouraged and creates a user account to continue to contribute to wikipedia.--Isotope23 20:26, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Pureblade | ^Word 21:35, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but Merge with Dave Coulier entry. This is his catchphrase (and would have been a lot better known ten years ago). Jtmichcock 23:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but Merge with Dave Coulier entry. Rock on Jtmichcock...First the top-notch chart on the dog variations, and now this dead on vote. It should mention the aggrivating hand gestures made by cast members and the Full House Drinking Game Youngamerican 23:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per Jtmichcock. PacknCanes 03:06, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Pete.Hurd 05:26, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.