Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curry fetish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Grandmasterka 05:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Curry fetish

This page refers to a non-notable and slanderous neologism ("a Non-Indian person that has a preference for Indian women") that may be a racist expression amongst Indian Youth. Article is probably better suited for www.urbandictionary.com. Author removed my prod tag, I'm listing the article here. Alphachimp ^talk 04:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above, unless notability (and probably non-offensive intent) can be proven. BigHaz 04:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per possible WP:NEO. Zos 04:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per BigHaz. RandyWang (^raves/_rants) 07:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 07:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete racist neologisms made up by bored high school kids. Danny Lilithborne 07:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, possibly coloured by personal feelings... but mainly per all the above. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 10:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete racist slang is bad, crap racist slang is worse. --Howard Train 10:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable neologoism. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Offensive and not notable. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 11:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, but encourage the editor to contribute further, as this was his first contribution -- Lost 11:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree with Lost. The editor had genuine intention of contributing to the project and he should be encouraged. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I'd agree with the consensus that it should probably be deleted as a not-yet-notable neologism, and lack of encyclopedic material in the article (it's just a slang dicdef), but manifestly the fact that an article is about "racist slang" does not mean that it should be deleted, if there is encyclopedic potential. We do have articles on ethnic slurs such as nigger, spic, and kike; wop is a redirect to List of ethnic slurs, and (as a more relevant example) a hatnote dab for yellow fever pointing to Asian fetish. Were it not that Asian fetish makes reference exclusively to East Asians, I would suggest a redirect there. --MCB 20:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just as non-notable. However, it is a variant on a genuine slang (and still nn) term. MLA 12:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research FancyPants 16:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.