Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuntonovich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete NSLE _(T+C) 01:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cuntonovich

neologism which even the profanaty-mad web only has eight times accrding to google. and seven of them are on the same webforum. BL kiss the lizard 00:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per non, also vanity (he mentions his name) DrIdiot 00:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the place for dictionary definitions of neologisms used by almost no-one :) - Haukur 00:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Uggh. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 01:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Second the "Uggh" Cyde Weys _vote^talk 06:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism.Obina 13:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense protologism. And any article on a derogatory term which cannot even spell derogatory correctly is clearly off to a bad start... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. BTW, who is Hirich Himler :) Cactus.man ✍ 15:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Izehar 18:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteNeologism, vanity (inserted own name) pov concerning historical figures (Hitler and possibly Heinrich Himmler mispelled as Hirich Himler) .--Dakota ~ ε 19:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.