Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cunduacán

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nom withdrawn (non-admin close). —Travistalk 01:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cunduacán

Cunduacán (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. It's a small town consisting of 10 villages. Article doesn't have any indication of notability or importance. A Google search results with some maps and minor information but there is no such significance that allows this town to have a standalone article on WP. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 17:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. All towns are notable. --Eastmain (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep or prehaps even Speedy Keep All towns are notable and this one has a population of over 80000.--Greatestrowerever (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2008 (GMT)
  • Keep - - "It's a small town consisting of 10 villages" is actually a reason to keep the article. Towns/villages are inherently notable. --Oakshade (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep per Oakshade. Tim Q. Wells (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Question:Do you (who went with a keep) think it should have a standalone article? -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 18:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn. Thanks for participating in this lively discussion. Cheers. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 19:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article in the Spanish Wikipedia at es:Cunduacán has a lot more information that could be added to this article. --Eastmain (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.