Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cum Dumpster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cum Dumpster

Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang. ShadowPuppet 16:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -Nv8200p talk 16:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete un-enclyopedic MLA 16:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 17:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Craig Stuntz 19:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Latinus 19:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Kusonaga 21:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Jesus Christ, delete this. --Antrophica 10:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• dicdef Derex 05:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, unencyclopedic. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 07:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Dicdef. It's got a reference, throw it to Wiktionary to see if they want it - David Gerard 13:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I added a comment to a forum at Wiktionary. Funny that I checked the Wiktionary link a while back and it worked, but the article there has now apparently been deleted. Seems, they don't even want this. --DanielCD 16:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 18:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandro67 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.