Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural references to polyamory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural references to polyamory

Cultural references to polyamory (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another bad, brief In Popular Culture article composed completely of trivia. Bulldog123 03:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Pointless list. Propaniac 15:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete More WP:NOT IPC. Eusebeus 16:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Incomplete to the point of utter uselessness. Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wow, 181 articles to review and this is just #135 -- Author is afraid to explain "polyamory" which is, essentially, a word for the enjoyment of an orgy. Of all the words that would have a lot of synonyms (group sex, etc), this is it. Not useful to anyone. Mandsford 23:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • See polyamory (which is, in fact, linked in the first sentence of this article). There are good reasons to delete this list of references, but this is not one of them. Zetawoof_(ζ) 00:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete on the one hand I think these generally notable, but there so far are not enough to justify a separate article. DGG (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#INFO. If every single mention of polyamorous relationships in popular culture was mentioned, it wouldn't be able to fit in one article. Spellcast 17:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.