Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural inhibitor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural inhibitor

del. neologism by a single author. Bordering on original research. Poured from the same barrel as recently deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideological nomadism. `'mikka (t) 06:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete looks like a sociological term desperately trying to catch on. Danny Lilithborne 07:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a poorly defined neologism invented by a single, vanity-pulished author. Quote from the lead: "Cultural Inhibitor has been defined as a culture [...] which [...] imposes unfavorable limitations on people and society". Well, that just about includes every culture there ever was. --Thorsten1 09:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original research definately. All three articles ( this one, Ideological nomadism and Subsistent worker) seem to be in the same vein as the musings of a single non-notable source with no reliable sources- Peripitus (Talk) 11:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.