Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural consultancies

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 03:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural consultancies

Delete. Tagged for cleanup since May 21, with the only edit since being to stub-categorize it. 34 unique Googles for "cultural consultancies" and 709 for the similar "cultural consultants". Neither the article nor the provided external links give me much of an idea of what a cultural consultancy is, and my Google search wasn't much help, either – everything is written in Marketese. In addition, the article seems to be just a vehicle for the external links. If anyone can make sense of this, be my guest, but if Wikipedia needs an article on this subject, it wouldn't hurt to start from scratch. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 01:07, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for all the reasons above - Barfooz (talk) 02:47, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Almost seems like vanity. Author/editor anonymous and only other addition is Millennium Institute which should also be deleted for same reasons. There is a notable industry (use of Sociology etc), but article should be made NPOV, broader etc etc. This thing looks like a bad Yahoo entry. -Snorre/Antwelm 06:47, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:08, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Absolutely take out Millennium Institute. These are something close to blatant advertising, and if there is a real industry back there, I'd wager it's covered best at a far more natural title. Geogre 15:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.