Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Satanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 17:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural Satanism

Cultural Satanism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be an opinions essay and not an encyclopedia article. Fails verifiability and no original research policies. IPSOS (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:OR. --Hornet35 08:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete some of these pages are a mess, this is OR as the phrase "cultural satanism" is not one commonly used. I thought this article was good when I saw it a few months ago. Maybe I was comparing it to Satanism which has been even worse in some of its incarnations. Most of the content here is either already in Satan, or it's just a list of things people have called 'satanic'.Merkinsmum 11:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. OR essay. A probable assertion but still in clear violation of WP:V and WP:SYN. NeoFreak 21:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. OR. Who the heck is "Police Captain Randy Johnson"? DWaterson 23:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete OR. This one should be speedied.--Sefringle^Talk 05:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not for unpublished facts, arguments, concepts, statements, or theories. The article is not verifiable because it is unsourced. --Pixelface 18:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete per nom, Pixelface, and everybody else; should have been speedied. --Orange Mike 20:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.