Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult of the frozen sheep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C) at 05:01 UTC (2006-05-25)

[edit] Cult of the frozen sheep

This is bordering on gibberish, variation on the Cult of the Flying Spaghetti Monster theme I guess (albeit without the notoriety). Unfortunately cases like this cannot be speedy deleted as Patent Nonsense, even though they clearly are. Rje 11:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Baa baa, don't let it thaw. (delete) Femto 11:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - clear hoax/nonsense. jnothman ^talk 12:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non verified WP:V and due to that seems to be a hoax or is nonsense.--blue520 12:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- this article embodies everything a Wikipedia article should not be. Reyk _YO! 12:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above Tom Harrison ^Talk 13:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 105 Ghits--Jusjih 15:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, unverifiable. --Terence Ong 15:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, bordering on gibberish is very diplomatic. No hits outside of myspace; only 6 unique ghits. Kuru ^talk 16:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, utterly worthless. Lankiveil 23:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, how is this not patent nonsense? Jdcooper 16:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and agree with Jdcooper - how is this not patent nonsense? - CNichols 22:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.