Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Consensus seems clear. No significant evidence of notability, use in media such as newspapers would be better than "small websites". Will userify on request. --++Lar: t/c 04:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cuic

Neologism. Author has repeatedly removed SD tags. Author has only one source for the word, and that source is a personal website. Feel free to speedy this article. I'm posting it here because the speedy tag has been removed several times. Rklawton 23:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. —EdGl 01:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The original author has now also removed the AfD tag. I've restored it, but we'll want to keep an eye out. Since the author has been warned about this prior to removing the tag he/she has also been reported as a vandal. Rklawton 02:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable; if it can be verified, transwiki to Wiktionary, as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Robin Johnson 10:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Update: original author has repeatedly removed the AfD tag and just now replaced it with an award nomination tag. Author has been warned not to remove maintenance templates - and has now been reported as a vandal. I think this serves as clear evidence the intentions of this author, and it reflects on the merits of the article under consideration here. Rklawton 19:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as a middle-aged life long New Englander who has never heard this term purportedly used by New Englanders. More relevantly, the sources in the article are not reliable, and this fails the standards at WP:NEO. GRBerry 22:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Unknown term which doesn't seem to be verifiable. Even if it is, Wikipedia is WP:NOT a dictionary.--Auger Martel 11:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.