Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuddle buddy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 02:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cuddle buddy

This is a term and should be in the wiktionary. Ginar 02:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete I dunno, does the wiktionary have "Snugglebunny" too? Ruby 02:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
    • snugglebunny! snugglebunny! snugglebunny! sn-
  • Delete improvised slang. Gazpacho 03:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. Cuddle buddy was the true cause of the Civil War! Delete and move over to Wiktionary if they don't already have it :-). JHMM13 (T | C) 03:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For the love of crumbcake, Delete! Dbtfz 03:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No need to transwiki; no evidence that usage as described in article is notable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 04:09Z
    • To clarify, it's fine as an endearment; the primary dicdef is the one that's unverified/not-notable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 10:21Z
  • Delete. per Dbtfz Crunch 13:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and don't transwiki, per Quarl. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robin Johnson (talk • contribs)
  • Transwiki to wiktionary, but no encyclopedia article needed. —This user has left wikipedia 14:16 2006-01-24
  • I've heard of it, but it definatly doesn't belong. Transwiki or delete. --^demon 17:58, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to Wiktionary as term definition. --James S. 23:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Quarl. --Zsinj 03:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as dictionary definition. Ask Wiktionary if they want it, though. — Phil Welch Are you a fan of the band Rush? 19:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Transwiki. --Brian1979 14:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.