Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal ball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was It took him hours and hours to climb back to the top of the cliff, but from where he stood the view was remarkable Grutness...wha? 01:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crystal ball

Crystal ball (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This page is a clear violation of policy and a perfect example of what Wikipedia is not. --UsaSatsui (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC) UsaSatsui (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - it looks like a perfectly good article to me, although it could use some references. Is this nomination an April Fools' Day prank? -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 16:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'd say that is a pretty good assumption. Useight (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Ahhh...don't know what to say about this but Crystal balls in this capacity are Notable and can be referenced and have been a part of culture around the world. The article could use some more references and citations sure but I really don't think that this should have come to AfD. Hmmm.... but does it violate WP:CRYSTAL!?!?!? {smile}. Any others that feel this should maybe a speedy and close?--Pmedema (talk) 16:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep, meets WP:CRYSTAL of course ;) TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 17:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Protest keep against canvassing AfDs per this. EJF (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Perhaps we should leave it up to the article to predict its own AfD? Joshdboz (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Are crystal balls what clairvoyants get when they're frustrated? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Nope. It's what they get after swimming in cold pools. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    • In the words of Patrick Wayne, "YOU WIN!!!" Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete It's the very epitome of what WP:CRYSTAL aims to keep out. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)The preceding user was already featured for an April Fools 2008 prank he perpetrated.
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, ignoring common WP:SENSE. -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^{Talk to me} _{Articles touched by my noodly appendage} 23:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - If we do not define what a Crystal ball is, how can we base a Policy (yes, Policy) around the term? Clearly a notable term, well used in various media. Hopefully a April Fools Nomination. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 23:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and improve; clearly a very notable term and concept even if the article itself is lame. csloat (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.