Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruz Beckham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was: reverted to redirect. sjorford →•← 23:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cruz Beckham
Not notable PatGallacher 11:12, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
There has already been some discussion of notable births on the Talk:2005 page. This person has no notability except that he has 2 well-known parents, even the entry is a redirect to his father. If we include him we have to include loads of children of celebrities. PatGallacher 11:09, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
- Comment it looks like an improperly coded redirect, rather than an actual article. since the beckhams' children have names that aren't likely to belong to anyone who is notable (brooklyn? c'mon), i dont see any harm in leaving it as a redirect, given the redirect is properly formatted. Nateji77 11:57, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
-
- Could you explain the distinction between a properly and improperly coded or formatted redirect? PatGallacher 12:17, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
- This was a properly coded redirect (i.e. it worked), but slapping a vfd notice on top of it stops it from working. Redirects should be discussed on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion anyway, and I don't see any good reason for deleting this one, so I've reverted it. People searching for "Cruz Beckham" ought to be redirected to his father. sjorford →•← 12:34, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Could you explain the distinction between a properly and improperly coded or formatted redirect? PatGallacher 12:17, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.