Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crucible Guild

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. FireFox 18:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Crucible Guild

Vanity/non-notable guild - Rudykog 00:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. -- Daverocks 00:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. It seems like the original author has tried blanking the page. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 00:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. A World of Warcraft guild is not, on it's own, notable enough for a Wikipedia entry. --Wingsandsword 02:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep (although it has to be rewritten completely, the existing content but not the page should be deleted). There's bound to be enough information on the site itself to provide verifiable sources, although of course the source has to be clearly stated. See here. —Simetrical (talk) 03:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
    • To clarify: it is my opinion, as explained elsewhere, that Wikipedia does not need notability requirements, and in this instance my opinion is not contrary to policy. —Simetrical (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps, but vanity and self-promotion are two things we don't need. Clans are simply unencyclopedic regardless of notability guidelines. Are you saying we should have every garage band in the world as well? - Mgm|(talk) 11:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Your opinion is contrary to policy. CSD specifically allows for speedy deletion of unremarkable people. Zoe (216.234.130.130 16:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC))
  • Delete, nn gaming clan. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Gaming clans are not notable in the least unless they have competed in top-level organized gaming competitions. Listing this "guild" is like listing a university's Ultimate Frisbee club team. FCYTravis 04:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Gaming clan vanity. Written in first person even. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, it's virtually impossible for a gaming clan to be notable. We should have a speedy delete for them. -- Kjkolb 08:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per FCYTravis--SarekOfVulcan 09:12, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. the wub "?!" 10:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 11:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 14:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. p_b1999 (Talk|Contribution) 00:44, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, gaming clan vanity, not encyclopedic. --Stormie 02:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.