Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critique of TM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 21:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Critique of TM

without gaining concensus, this page was created, and the entire Transcendental meditation article was placed here. The User wishes to segment out every criticism of TM out of main article. I am struggling to get this user to do such things as not post under one of three different accounts User:Peterklutz, User:PeterKlutz and User:85.30.186.206, redirecting talk pages to the article, editing two different versions of same article at once Transcendental meditation and Transcendental Meditation. Besides input on this page, any other help appreciated!!!!Sethie 23:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete POV fork, with no consensus, less then two hours of discussion, made by an editor with less then a week's experience, who is engaged in all sorts of shady practices. Sethie 23:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete As per above, no concensus, this is a pov attempt at removing criticism from main article. Also 'critique' means an analysis of a subject that usn't necessarily critical in nature. Sfacets 01:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete As per both above. Nuttah68 09:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
This AfD nomination was incomplete; listing now. - Liberatore(T) 18:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Looking at the fight, it seems someone doesn't like the PoV of the article. Dominick (TALK) 19:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete as above. Xyrael T 19:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.