Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of The Subways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 19:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism of The Subways

• Delete - Forked off of The Subways. Already controversy over this, so its been brought it here. Any useful info should be merged and then this deleted. Wickethewok 09:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It would be perfectly fine if the article was even remotely well-written and properly sourced, but it's not. Morever, this is section material and doesn't deserve its own entry. --Antrophica 09:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge whatever's salvagable to The Subways. Ac@osr 10:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not only is this unsourced and a fork, the coverage of this Indie band with one whole LP to its name is already grossly excessive. And I was born in Hertfordshire. Just zis Guy you know? 14:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I have not been able to verify any of the this article. --Cjakob 14:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable, should be in section in 'The Subways' if anywhere, except it's too poorly written and unsourced. Amists 14:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Personal opinion, original research, inherently POV (due to being almost completely unsourced) fork. -- Kicking222 15:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a fork, plain and simple. --Agamemnon2 11:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.