Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticalmuralism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Criticalmuralism

Criticalmuralism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced, orphaned article. I have been unable to locate any non-Wikipedia resources discussing this topic. If this process is better known by another name, rename/merge suggestions would be welcome, of course. JavaTenor 19:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - can't find any kind of web page on Google that obviously isn't a old copy of the Wikipedia page. If the creator can come up with a few good references I would reconsider. T. Moitie [talk] 19:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. A possible target for redirect or merge is Community art, although that article has problems of its own, as the tag on the page indicates. I've never encountered the term criticalmuralism, but artist-community interaction in the creation of public art is certainly a widespread phenomenon supported by a good deal of theoretical literature. This sort of thing just doesn't seem to be covered very well on WP. Deor 19:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment 71 G-hits, but not all of them are Wikipedia or its mirrors. Morgan Wick 20:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - If you search Google with "Criticalmuralism -wikipedia -answers -dbpedia" you get a total of 6 hits. Each of which does nothing but cite (or directly link) to the Wikipedia article. One of which is literally a direct copy of the article, right down to the AfD banner. The article appears to only exist to promote this concept. Delete as WP:OR and possibly WP:SPAM. -- Kesh 02:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Lack of non-wiki ghits, no claim of notability in article.--Kathy A. 22:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.